Pick Me Girls And Fashion Clickbait
The digital era keeps coming for the way we dress, and I’m sick of it
Hot Takes are my bullet point thoughts on fashion's hottest issues. These posts get to the heart of why people are talking about what they’re talking about, what this means, and where this could go next.
Let’s set the scene.
Fashion has always been a battleground for identity, but lately, it feels more like a popularity contest. One where the stakes are social media engagement and viral discourse. Because this is the digital age we are living in, after all. Enter the so-called ‘pick-me girl’, the latest sartorial scapegoat aimed hook, line and sinker at women.
Here’s the thing, what was once a personality-based critique has now been hijacked by the fashion industry and weaponized for engagement-driven discourse. You know those street interviews popping up all over the FYP, asking people their fashion red flags? And they describe a certain type of woman who dresses a certain type of way? Yeah, those. And they’re working like a charm.
Originally, the pick-me girl was a social media trope: think of her as the digital-age iteration of a cool girl with a slightly androgynous vibe, the one who aligns herself with male approval by shunning traditionally feminine traits.
But somewhere along the way, this concept became an aesthetic. Suddenly, you’ve got everyone and their entourage dissecting outfits through the pick-me lens, asking whether certain trends — clean girl minimalism, tomboy chic, even the resurgence of the balletcore — were just thinly veiled bids for male validation.
But here’s the kicker: labelling a woman’s fashion choices as pick-me has become just as reductive as the phenomenon it claims to critique. The whole discourse is next-level fashion clickbait, designed to go viral, spark debates, and, rather ironically, engage the very same validation-seeking impulses it pretends to deconstruct.
The belonging trap, or dressing like you do
Fashion has always been a tool for belonging. Subcultures from punk to preppy, Y2K to skater, have allowed people to visually signal their identity. But in the TikTok era, the need to belong has morphed into the need to be legible. Because if your aesthetic can’t be neatly categorized in a 10-second clip, does it even exist?
The pick-me aesthetic falls into this trap by creating another box for women to fit into, another way to define themselves in opposition to others. Or, if it’s a video of the red flag variety, trying in every way possible to remove themselves by association from anything even merely pick me related.
And therein lies the real problem: as soon as fashion is filtered through the lens of "what it says about you," identity itself starts feeling transactional. Women aren’t just dressing for themselves; they’re dressing to make a statement about what kind of woman they are — or, more crucially, what kind they are not.
If you wear oversized hoodies and sneakers, are you trying too hard to be different? If you wear a baby tee and a plaid mini, are you performing femininity to an audience of men? When every choice is scrutinized through the hyper-judgmental eye of social media, it’s no wonder fashion starts to feel more like a costume than an expression of self.
The validation spiral aka society’s oldest trick
Of course, none of this happens in a vacuum. The very concept of the pick-me girl only exists because of the cultural pressures placed on women to dress, act, and exist in ways that maximize their social desirability.
Society has long dictated what kinds of femininity are acceptable, and the goalposts keep shifting. First, women were expected to be ultra-feminine, then undeniably cool, and now we’re expected to look effortless in a way that looks like we haven’t tried at all. The pick-me label is just another layer of this pressure, forcing us to second-guess ourselves.
The irony? The fashion industry has already figured out how to capitalize on this existential dilemma. Brands are marketing to both sides of the debate — one moment pushing hyper-feminine Barbie-coded silhouettes under the guise of female empowerment but let’s make it tradwife, the next promoting oversized fits that look like you just rolled out of bed.
The entire discourse is a well-oiled machine, fueled by engagement, clicks, and the never-ending desire to define (and redefine) what it means to dress for oneself. But instead of always trying to get one up on each other, maybe we should start taking less notice of what others have to say about what we wear, and more notice about how our clothes make us feel.
My two cents.
At the heart of all this is a simple truth: not every woman who wears baggy jeans and a sports cap is a pick-me girl. Not every woman who embraces ballet flats and bows is pandering to men.
I know that if you were to look in my wardrobe, you’d stumble across clothing that could easily fall into both categories. One day, I may look like a leprechaun at the end of a rainbow spit out my outfit, and the next, I may look like I’m auditioning to be part of The Addams Family. I do monochromatic black and I also do pink, and that’s entirely my prerogative.
People wear what they wear for a million different reasons — comfort, nostalgia, mood, availability, personal taste. But the internet loves a label, and the pick-me girl trend is just another way to oversimplify something that’s fundamentally complex: personal style.
So, what’s the solution? Maybe it’s time to stop assigning intent to outfits and let fashion do what it’s meant to do — evolve, adapt, and, most importantly, exist beyond the approval of a trending discourse.
After all, the real pick-me move isn’t dressing for validation — it’s pretending that the way someone else dresses is any of your business to begin with.
If you're vibing with this newsletter, subscribe to get weekly doses of fashion goodness straight in your inbox. It’s worth it, I promise.
Want to get in touch?
Follow me on Instagram
Follow me on Twitter
Follow me on LinkedIn